Key Takeaways
- In 2025, 49 crypto exchanges registered with India’s FIU, including 45 local and four offshore platforms.
- The FIU imposed fines totaling approximately $3.1 million on non-compliant exchanges, with major penalties levied against platforms like Bybit.
- The overhaul cracked down on illicit activities, blocked unregistered offshore sites, and paved the way for safer, regulated crypto trading in India.
After years of uncertainty, India’s crypto market finally received what it had long lacked in 2025: a clear regulatory spine.
What had existed for much of the past decade as a gray-zone industry—neither fully banned nor formally recognized—was pulled into a defined compliance framework.
The result was one of India’s most consequential crypto policy shifts to date, reshaping how exchanges operate, how users trade, and how authorities enforce the rules.
At the center of the overhaul was the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), which moved decisively to register platforms, penalize violations, and assert oversight over the world’s largest crypto hub.
Bringing India’s Crypto Industry Under a Net
India’s approach to the crypto industry has always been cautious, but 2025 marked a turning point, where regulation shifted from sporadic enforcement to a full-fledged framework.
In 2025, the FIU, under the country’s Finance Ministry, took charge of the crypto ecosystem, imposing a new registration mandate and levying hefty fines on violators.
The financial watchdog imposed new rules aimed at cracking down on money laundering and other shady activities.
Crypto service providers were brought under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) of 2002.
Registered platforms were required to submit suspicious transaction reports, appoint compliance officers, conduct internal audits, and screen transactions against sanctions lists.
Wallet monitoring, scrutiny of token launches, and oversight of transfers between hosted and unhosted wallets have were also made part of routine compliance.
For regulators, the aim was straightforward: reduce the risks of money laundering, terror financing, and fraud without shutting the door on legitimate crypto activity.
For exchanges, the shift resulted in heavier operational costs and tighter controls—but also regulatory legitimacy.
49 Exchanges Approved, Millions in Penalties
The result of the FIU’s reign was exceptional.
By March 2025, a total of 49 crypto exchanges had registered with the regulator —45 based in India and four operating offshore.
Alongside registrations came enforcement.
The FIU levied penalties totaling roughly ₹28 crore (about $3.1 million) against exchanges found in violation of anti-money laundering (AML) and reporting requirements.
Among the most prominent cases, the FIU fined Bybit ₹9.27 crore and has launched probes into other global platforms over tax compliance and reporting failures.
What It Means for India’s Crypto Investors and Industry
For everyday users, the changes translate into stricter onboarding, more detailed KYC checks, and potentially higher costs as exchanges pass on compliance expenses.
At the same time, the presence of regulated platforms offers stronger safeguards and reduces the risk of sudden shutdowns or blocked access.
For the broader ecosystem, the overhaul lays the groundwork for institutional participation.
Clearer rules make it easier for large investors, payment firms, and fintech players to engage with crypto markets that previously felt legally ambiguous.
With the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) digital rupee gaining traction and discussions on licensing frameworks, 2026 could bring even more clarity.
In 2026, expect continued evolution and more leniency towards global trends, such as stablecoin regulations and market structures in the U.S., which may influence India.
The focus will likely shift to the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA) and improved coordination with international bodies, such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
The Road Ahead: Regulation Still in Motion
Despite the progress, challenges remain—particularly India’s long-standing institutional skepticism toward private cryptocurrencies.
The RBI has repeatedly warned that crypto assets pose risks to financial stability and monetary sovereignty.
Its opposition was central to the 2017 banking restrictions that once cut crypto firms off from financial services.
While those bans no longer stand, the RBI continues to favor central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) over privately issued tokens.
That tension means India’s regulatory story is far from finished.
With nearly 50 exchanges now operating under FIU oversight and more seeking registration, pressure is building for a more comprehensive framework that goes beyond AML enforcement.
Many in the industry expect the next phase to address stablecoins, market structure, and asset tokenization—areas where global standards are beginning to take shape.
International interest in India’s massive user base could also push policymakers toward clearer, more predictable rules.
A Turning Point, Not a Ban
India’s 2025 crackdown was not about eliminating crypto. It was about pulling it out of regulatory limbo.
With dozens of registered exchanges and millions of dollars in fines already issued, the country has drawn a firm line between compliant innovation and unchecked activity.
The message is clear: crypto can operate in India—but only within the rules.
What comes next will determine whether India becomes a tightly regulated participant in the global digital asset economy, or simply a cautious gatekeeper watching from the sidelines.
